Evidence-Based Practice

Journal Entry 3

A group of people talking  Description automatically generated

Submit a journal entry (along with your time log). The journal entry is your opportunity to be self-reflective and needs to connect your previous professional experience with your practice, competencies/concepts in the program, and the literature. See the Practicum Guidelines located in the Practicum area, and this week’s Learning Resources, for a complete description of the practicum.

Submit your Assignment by Day 3 of Week 11.

 

Resources

 

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCE

Learning Resources

Required Readings

· Dang, D., Dearholt, S. L., Bissett, K., Ascenzi, J., & Whalen, M. (2021).  Johns Hopkins evidence-based practice for nurses and healthcare professionals: Model and guidelines (4th ed.). Sigma Theta Tau International.

· Chapter 6, “Evidence Appraisal: Research” (pp. 129–162)

· Appendices

· Kearney, M. H. (2015).  Moving from facts to wisdom: Facilitating synthesis in literature reviewsLinks to an external site..  Research in Nursing and Health,  39(1), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21706

· Wakefield, A. (2015).  Synthesizing the literature as part of a literature reviewLinks to an external site..  Nursing Standard,  18(29), 44–51. doi:10.7748/ns.29.29.44.e8957

· Document:  Evidence Synthesis and Recommendation Form  Download Evidence Synthesis and Recommendation Form(Microsoft Word document)

 

Rubric

NURS_8502_Week11_Assignment1_Rubric

NURS_8502_Week11_Assignment1_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflect on the practicum experience hours completed.
45 to >40.0 pts

Excellent

The response comprehensively and clearly reflects on the practicum experience. … The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the reflection.

40 to >35.0 pts

Good

The response clearly reflects on the practicum experience. … The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the reflection.

35 to >31.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely reflects on the practicum experience. … The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the reflection.

31 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely reflects on the practicum experience, or it is missing. … The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support reflection, or it is missing.

 

45 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeComplete the Practicum Time Log.
40 to >0.0 pts

Excellent

A completed Practicum Time Log is submitted.

0 pts

Fair

0 pts

Good

0 pts

Poor

An incomplete Practicum Time Log is submitted, or it is missing.

 

40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. … A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. … No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

 

5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

 

5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

 

5 pts
Total Points: 100

 

image1.jpeg